SIF Inspector performs deterministic second-pass structural inspection of governed metrology concepts and supported technical structures in an existing English-to-Ukrainian translation.
Metrology · English → Ukrainian · bounded structural inspection
Accepted input: one aligned English–Ukrainian segment, up to two short sentences; not an entire document.
The Inspector receives an aligned English source and an already-produced Ukrainian translation. It does not generate the translation.
Current operational scope: one aligned short English–Ukrainian semantic segment, up to two sentences.
Inputs outside the aligned-segment contract are returned as INPUT OUTSIDE INSPECTION SCOPE.
Verification first. The submitted Ukrainian translation remains unchanged unless an explicitly authorised repair mode is used.
Inspection sequence
How inspection works
From aligned text to an inspectable result and next action.
English source + existing Ukrainian translation
Source-side detection
Context qualification
Two independent inspection surfaces
Decision routing
Visible evidence
Operator action
Recorded Inspector evidence · CASE 07 / 08
From two existing texts to a bounded structural decision
CASE 07 is shown exactly as recorded in the frozen Inspector replay. This visual explanation is not a new or live execution.
One STRICT-mode segment: three canonical concepts and a separately recorded technical-structure status.
Aligned source and existing translation
1 · English source
In conformity assessment, the acceptance limit AU is compared with the tolerance limit TU.
2 · Existing Ukrainian translation
Під час оцінювання відповідності границя прийняття AU порівнюється з границею допуску TU.
↓ Registry and technical checks
Two independent inspection surfaces
3 · Governed concepts · CANONICAL
оцінювання відповідностіanch_conform_assess
границя прийняттяanch_accept_lim
границя допускуanch_tol_lim
4 · Technical structure
Recorded coverage: PRESENT
Recorded status: PRESERVED
This is the frozen replay's technical finding, not a new calculation.
↓ Recorded decision routing
5 · Recorded outcome: STRUCTURAL PASS — activated checks preserved
Recorded decision: PASS; reason: NO_REPAIR_NEEDED.
6 · Professional next action
No SIF repair is required for the inspected structural surface; continue normal professional review.
Limit: No whole-document, complete semantic-fidelity, independent expert-validation or universal numerical-error-detection claim follows from this recorded case.
Independent checks
Two independent inspection surfaces
Surface 01
Governed concepts
Versioned Metrology Registry
Activated controlled concept
Expected canonical Ukrainian identity
Occurrence / context comparison
Governed metrology concepts are checked against a frozen, versioned Registry.
Examples: measurement uncertainty, maximum permissible error, conformity assessment, decision rule.
Surface 02
Supported technical structures
Values · units · SI expressions · formulas · constants
Source structure↔Translation structure
Supported technical structures are inspected independently through dedicated processing rules.
Result states
Three principal result states
Principal result state 01
STRUCTURAL PASS — activated checks preserved
The governed concepts and/or supported technical structures activated for this segment were preserved.
Operator action: No SIF correction is required for the checked surface. Continue normal professional review.
Boundary: PASS is scope-bounded. It is not certification of overall translation correctness, terminology completeness, scientific correctness or whole-document meaning.
Principal result state 02
STRUCTURAL REVIEW REQUIRED — activated check not preserved
At least one activated governed concept or supported technical structure was not preserved or cannot be safely resolved under the active contract.
Operator action: Read the evidence for the affected item. Review or correct it as appropriate and inspect again if useful.
The next action depends on whether a validated bounded repair is available in the active mode. Review-required cases do not all have the same resolution path.
Principal result state 03
NO ACTIVE STRUCTURAL CHECKS
No currently supported governed concept or technical structure was activated for the submitted segment.
Operator action: Continue normal professional review.
Boundary: No SIF claim is made for unactivated Registry or technical surfaces.
Recorded execution evidence
Public evidence replay
Explore eight recorded SIF Inspector cases: seven structural inspections and one input-gate refusal. Each case presents fixed English and Ukrainian inputs, the recorded decision, resulting text and substantive evidence digest.
The eight recorded cases cover preserved canonical concepts (01, 07), bounded repair (02), refusal to repair (03), a deliberately corrupted technical negative control (04), no activated checks (05), a protected unit (06), and an input-gate refusal (08). CASE 04 tests the missing 5.25 kg carrier, not the separate change of meaning. CASE 05 shows why no active structural checks is not translation-quality PASS. This remains a static recorded replay, not a live inspection service.
Operating modes define what the Inspector is allowed to do. They are not result states.
VERIFY ONLY — DEFAULT
Internal canonical mode: STRICT
Inspect without modifying the submitted translation.
SAFE REPAIR
Internal canonical mode: SAFE_REPAIR
Apply only validated bounded deterministic repairs. Every change must remain visible and attributable.
DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS
Internal canonical mode: DIAGNOSTIC
Expose structural findings and candidate actions for analysis. Candidate actions are not approved repairs.
Conditional intervention
Bounded repair is conditional
SAFE_REPAIR is an operating mode, not a result state.
Structural mismatch detected
Is a validated runtime-authorised repair available?
↙↘
YES — authorised repair available
Visible bounded repair
Re-inspection
NO — no authorised repair
Translation unchanged
Human review / professional action
Decision trace
The result shows why
Decision
What to do
What changed
Resulting / submitted translation
Protected technical structures
Structural evidence
For an activated governed concept, evidence may show the expected canonical form, submitted form and reason.
Evidence for supported technical structures is reported independently.
Governing specification
Versioned Metrology Registry
41controlled concepts
The current metrology implementation contains 41 controlled concepts with canonical Ukrainian forms and documented authority / provenance.
The Registry supplies governed concept identity to the Inspector. It is a bounded verification specification, not exhaustive terminology coverage.
Different objects: the Metrology Registry is the governing specification used by SIF Inspector. The Technical Evidence Register is the public research-evidence register on this website.
Bounded evidence
Engineering qualification
279tests reported passed12/12reported final frozen gate0reported regressions in the stated checks
These are recorded engineering-qualification results. The original 279-test execution logs and 12-gate records were not recovered for independent verification during the website evidence review. The eight-case public replay is a separate static evidence replay, not the qualification test archive. Professional-pilot evidence remains pending.