PUBLIC RESEARCH DEMONSTRATION · METROLOGY · ENGLISH → UKRAINIAN
Structural inspection — evidence replay
Explore eight recorded SIF Inspector v0.1.4 cases on English source segments and existing Ukrainian translations: seven structural-inspection cases and one input-gate refusal. All inputs and outputs are fixed; these are not live executions.
SELECT AN EXAMPLE
Eight recorded cases
Five main examples and three additional controls, including one input-gate refusal before inspection. Every case displays its fixed inputs and recorded outcome; no “Run” button is required.
CASE 01 OF 08 · DEMO-01
Already canonical
The controlled term remains canonical.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INSPECTOR RESULT · STRICT
STRUCTURAL PASS — activated checks preserved
The activated governed concepts and/or supported technical structures were preserved.
Next action: No SIF repair is required for the inspected structural surface.
Recorded resulting translation
Overall professional acceptance remains a separate human decision.
Technical evidence and decision codes
Governed concepts activated
CASE 02 OF 08 · DEMO-02
Safe repair
The original noncanonical term remains a recorded structural finding; an allowed bounded repair was performed.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INSPECTOR RESULT · SAFE_REPAIR
STRUCTURAL REVIEW REQUIRED — activated check not preserved
An activated governed concept or supported technical structure was not preserved.
Next action: Use the bounded repaired output for subsequent professional assessment. No additional manual rewrite of the affected span is required.
The structural finding remains recorded against the submitted text. SAFE_REPAIR applied the permitted bounded change; the recorded decision is VERIFY_REPAIRED, not PASS. “Human review required: No” means no further manual rewriting is required for this repair. Overall professional acceptance remains a separate human decision.
Recorded bounded repair
A repaired term does not establish whole-translation acceptance.
Recorded resulting translation
Overall professional acceptance remains a separate human decision.
Technical evidence and decision codes
Here “No” means no additional manual rewrite is required after the permitted bounded repair. The original structural finding remains visible; VERIFY_REPAIRED is the recorded repair decision, not whole-translation acceptance.
Governed concepts activated
CASE 03 OF 08 · DEMO-03
Human review
The source and target align in meaning except for the deliberately incorrect term; automatic repair is not admitted.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INSPECTOR RESULT · SAFE_REPAIR
STRUCTURAL REVIEW REQUIRED — activated check not preserved
An activated governed concept or supported technical structure was not preserved.
Next action: Review the affected span manually, restore or correct it, then inspect the segment again.
Recorded resulting translation
Overall professional acceptance remains a separate human decision.
Technical evidence and decision codes
Governed concepts activated
CASE 04 OF 08 · DEMO-04
Technical mismatch
Deliberately corrupted negative control: the Ukrainian target omits 5.25 kg and changes the sentence’s meaning.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INSPECTOR RESULT · STRICT
STRUCTURAL REVIEW REQUIRED — activated check not preserved
An activated governed concept or supported technical structure was not preserved.
Next action: Review the affected span manually, restore or correct it, then inspect the segment again.
This is a deliberately corrupted negative control, not an ordinary translation with an accidental error. The missing 5.25 kg was introduced to test technical-structure detection. The accompanying change in meaning is part of the deliberately corrupted negative control and is not independently assessed by this check.
Recorded resulting translation
Overall professional acceptance remains a separate human decision.
Technical evidence and decision codes
Technical findings
CASE 05 OF 08 · DEMO-05
No active checks
No governed concept or supported technical structure activates. This is not a translation-quality PASS.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INSPECTOR RESULT · STRICT
NO ACTIVE STRUCTURAL CHECKS
No frozen Registry concept or supported technical structure was activated for this submission.
Next action: Continue with normal professional review.
The internal recorded decision is PASS only because no governed concept or supported technical structure was activated. The public outcome is NO ACTIVE STRUCTURAL CHECKS — not a structural PASS or any assessment of translation quality.
Recorded resulting translation
No structural claim is made outside the activated SIF inspection surfaces.
Technical evidence and decision codes
Internal PASS indicates completion with zero activated checks. It does not mean STRUCTURAL_PASS_ACTIVATED_CHECKS_PRESERVED or demonstrate translation correctness.
CASE 06 OF 08 · DEMO-06
Protected unit
The value/unit is checked separately from Registry-controlled concepts.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INSPECTOR RESULT · STRICT
STRUCTURAL PASS — activated checks preserved
The activated governed concepts and/or supported technical structures were preserved.
Next action: No SIF repair is required for the inspected structural surface.
Recorded resulting translation
Overall professional acceptance remains a separate human decision.
Technical evidence and decision codes
CASE 07 OF 08 · DEMO-07
Three governed concepts
Conformity assessment, acceptance limit and tolerance limit remain distinguishable.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INSPECTOR RESULT · STRICT
STRUCTURAL PASS — activated checks preserved
The activated governed concepts and/or supported technical structures were preserved.
Next action: No SIF repair is required for the inspected structural surface.
Recorded resulting translation
Overall professional acceptance remains a separate human decision.
Technical evidence and decision codes
Governed concepts activated
CASE 08 OF 08 · DEMO-08
Out-of-scope input
Input-gate boundary control: three aligned sentences exceed the maximum of two; structural inspection did not run.
RECORDED EVIDENCE REPLAY · NO LIVE INSPECTION
RECORDED INPUT GATE REFUSAL · STRICT REQUEST
INPUT OUT OF SCOPE — input gate refusal
The submitted text was not inspected because it exceeds the one aligned short-segment boundary.
Next action: Submit one aligned English–Ukrainian semantic segment, up to two sentences.
OUT_OF_SCOPE_INPUT is an input-gate refusal before structural inspection, not a fourth structural result state.
Submitted Ukrainian text (not inspected)
No structural claim is made for out-of-scope input.
Technical evidence and decision codes
ABOUT / SCOPE
What the demo establishes
This is a static projection of recorded executions of SIF Inspector v0.1.4 (runtime baseline v0.1.3, frozen core v0.1.1, Registry v2.0.5 CR-01 CLOSED, 41 governed metrology concepts). It does not execute the Inspector runtime or enable arbitrary user input.
Scope: activated governed concepts and supported technical structures only. A structural PASS is not certification of the overall translation. NO ACTIVE STRUCTURAL CHECKS means no activated coverage. Professional acceptance remains a human decision.
This public replay includes recorded STRICT and SAFE_REPAIR cases. DIAGNOSTIC is supported by SIF Inspector but is not represented in this case set.
The substantive evidence digest (SHA-256) identifies the stable content of a recorded request and its result. It is not a hash of this HTML file and does not constitute independent expert validation.
The cases include semantically aligned EN–UA pairs, deliberate negative controls and an explicit input-boundary refusal.
Method & system architecture: Yurii Kuzmenko · Olena Trofimova · National Metrology Institute, Kyiv.